The following are posts from when our party fb was first started. The first month of January 2017.
I'm going to go through all of our posts and put on our blog. The reason being is that so much of our social media posts are on fb because of how easy it is to do.
When I catch up I will switch to weekly or daily posts. So that everything that is on fb is on here as well.
The plan then is to continue copying over to our substack since it's easier to find things.
----
Sunday January 1, 2017
Happy New Year! Let's work together to make 2017 great!!
Thursday January 5, 2017

The White House@WhiteHouse
2 hours ago
"The change we’ve brought about these past eight years was never about me. It was about you." —@POTUS: go.wh.gov/CabinetInReview
USA TODAY Politics@usatodayDC
3 hours ago
5 takeaways from the Senate hearing on Russian hacks usat.ly/2j9cByR via @ErinVKelly

Friday January 6, 2017

Do you care about the future of Texas & protecting our families from #txlege Trump Republicans, take this survey➝ bit.ly/2ja4kyC
Saturday January 7, 2017

They must be stopped.
Read more here: http://cnb.cx/2hYjffq
Image by Occupy Democrats, LIKE our page for more!
Sunday January 8, 2017

Tuesday January 10, 2017

Wednesday January 11, 2017

Thursday January 12, 2017

Friday January 13, 2017

Friday January 20, 2017



Saturday January 21, 2017

We’re ready to hit the ground running and get to work on the issues that matter to Texas working families, but we need your input. Take our 2017 Legislative Priorities Survey TODAY and make your voice heard: http://bit.ly/2hdzd4S
Monday January 23, 2017

Tuesday January 24, 2017

Wednesday January 25, 2017



My brother, Todd Trautman, was a national debate champion, so even casual discussions with him sometimes include him asking, "What's your source?" We must always consider the quality of our information as we seek to understand both sides or use the info in an argument. This chart is helpful for that.
It was created by a person named Vanessa Otero (who I don't know) and doesn't claim to be based on a scientific analysis, just a conversation starter to make sense of the media landscape. I hope that helps!
Thursday January 26, 2017

Thanks to Evelyn Burleson for passing down her donkey and Democrat pin. I will work hard to follow in your footsteps. Sandy
We had a great meeting tonight! Thanks to all who attended!

Science is not Democratic or Republican, progressive or conservative. Science is science. There are no "alternative facts." A modern society cannot survive unless decisions are made on evidence-based research. Congratulations to those scientists and researchers who are fighting back.
Friday January 27, 2017

Saturday January 28, 2017

Most of you have seen the draft executive order on immigration and refugees that the President is expected to sign. If signed as written, it would ban Syrian refugees from entering our country, suspend the entire refugee program for 120 days, cut in half the number of refugees we can admit, and halt all travel from certain Muslim countries.
Having looked at the draft, I felt I had no choice but to speak out against it in the strongest possible terms.
In doing so, I want to make three points.
First, it is a cruel measure that represents a stark departure from America's core values. We have a proud tradition of sheltering those fleeing violence and persecution, and have always been the world leader in refugee resettlement. As a refugee myself who fled the communist takeover of Czechoslovakia, I personally benefited from this country’s generosity and its tradition of openness. This order would end that tradition, and discriminate against those fleeing a brutal civil war in Syria. It does not represent who we are as a country.
Second, this measure would directly harm our security interests. As you all know, the humanitarian crisis in the Middle East poses an extraordinary threat to the stability of that region and to our allies in Europe. We need to be doing more, not less, to alleviate the problem – and one important way to do that is to accept a modest number of thoroughly vetted refugees. The signing of this executive order would send a terrible signal to our allies in Europe and in the Middle East, who will now have an excuse to do less. It will also be a gift to ISIS, which has been telling Muslims around the world that the west is their enemy. I have no doubt they will use this order as propaganda to support that claim.
Third, there is no data to support the idea that refugees pose a threat. This policy is based on fear, not facts. The refugee vetting process is robust and thorough. It already consists of over 20 steps, ensuring that refugees are vetted more intensively than any other category of traveler.
The process typically takes 18-24 months, and is conducted while they are still overseas. I am concerned that this order’s attempts at “extreme vetting” will effectively halt our ability to accept anyone at all. . When the administration makes wild claims about Syrian refugees pouring over our borders, they are relying on alternative facts – or as I like to call it, fiction.
The truth is that America can simultaneously protect the security of our borders and our citizens and maintain our country’s long tradition of welcoming those who have nowhere else to turn. These goals are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, they are the obligation of a country built by immigrants.
Refugees should not be viewed as a certain burden or potential terrorists. They have already made great contributions to our national life. Syrian refugees are learning English, getting good jobs, buying homes, and starting businesses. In other words, they are doing what other generations of refugees – including my own – did. And I have no doubt that, if given the opportunity, they will become an essential part of our American fabric.
Yesterday, I tweeted about my own background. I was raised a Catholic, married an Episcopalian and then found out I was Jewish. I said in my tweet that should a registry of Muslims be instituted by this administration, I would add my name to such a list.
Such a registry is not included in the language of this order, but by targeting Muslim-majority countries for immigration bans and by expressing a clear preference for refugees who are religious minorities, there’s no question this order is biased against Muslims. And when one faith is targeted, it puts us all at risk.
When I came here as a child, I will never forget sailing into New York Harbor for the first time and seeing the Statue of Liberty. It proclaims “give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” There is no fine print on the Statue of Liberty, and today she is weeping because of the actions of President Trump.
President Trump’s first seven days of false claims, inaccurate statements and exaggerations http://ow.ly/AtyK308rBHx
A good article on Mexico exports. http://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/mex/
Monday January 30, 2017

This first week has been a test of how far they can push as well as figuring out how much further they can go.
Unless Trump is impeached or 25A and Bannon, Conway, Flynn, Miller, Kosher, Sessions, Rudy, and Manafort are fired...we are getting a dictatorship.
The rise and rise of Steve Bannon –> The former head of extreme right-wing Breitbart news is ever-increasing his power and influence in the White House. “While the American public’s attention was focused on the thousands of families whose lives were disrupted and even put at risk by Trump’s ban on Muslims entering the USA, the US Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff were removed from the list of permanent attendees in the President’s National Security Council,” author Corey Doctorow writes for the blog Boing Boing. “They were replaced with white nationalist Trump advisor Steve Bannon. Trump announced the changes shortly after speaking with Putin for an hour.”
Sign up for our Morning Reads daily newsletter here: http://billmoyers.com/.../morning-reads-steve-bannon.../#
Check out this article from USA TODAY:
Fact check: Trump’s immigration policy vs. Obama's
Here's a list of Reps and Senators to call and hound. Make them take a stand.
President Trump's executive actions: The complete list so far http://ow.ly/ai4l308w0gi
Tuesday January 31, 2017

From Heather Richardson, professor of History at Boston College:
"I don't like to talk about politics on Facebook-- political history is my job, after all, and you are my friends-- but there is an important non-partisan point to make today.
What Bannon is doing, most dramatically with last night's ban on immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries-- is creating what is known as a "shock event."
Such an event is unexpected and confusing and throws a society into chaos. People scramble to react to the event, usually along some fault line that those responsible for the event can widen by claiming that they alone know how to restore order.
When opponents speak out, the authors of the shock event call them enemies. As society reels and tempers run high, those responsible for the shock event perform a sleight of hand to achieve their real goal, a goal they know to be hugely unpopular, but from which everyone has been distracted as they fight over the initial event. There is no longer concerted opposition to the real goal; opposition divides along the partisan lines established by the shock event.
Last night's Executive Order has all the hallmarks of a shock event. It was not reviewed by any governmental agencies or lawyers before it was released, and counterterrorism experts insist they did not ask for it. People charged with enforcing it got no instructions about how to do so. Courts immediately have declared parts of it unconstitutional, but border police in some airports are refusing to stop enforcing it.
Predictably, chaos has followed and tempers are hot.
My point today is this: unless you are the person setting it up, it is in no one's interest to play the shock event game. It is designed explicitly to divide people who might otherwise come together so they cannot stand against something its authors think they won't like.
I don't know what Bannon is up to-- although I have some guesses-- but because I know Bannon's ideas well, I am positive that there is not a single person whom I consider a friend on either side of the aisle-- and my friends range pretty widely-- who will benefit from whatever it is.
If the shock event strategy works, though, many of you will blame each other, rather than Bannon, for the fallout. And the country will have been tricked into accepting their real goal.
But because shock events destabilize a society, they can also be used positively. We do not have to respond along old fault lines. We could just as easily reorganize into a different pattern that threatens the people who sparked the event.
A successful shock event depends on speed and chaos because it requires knee-jerk reactions so that people divide along established lines. This, for example, is how Confederate leaders railroaded the initial southern states out of the Union.
If people realize they are being played, though, they can reach across old lines and reorganize to challenge the leaders who are pulling the strings. This was Lincoln's strategy when he joined together Whigs, Democrats, Free-Soilers, anti-Nebraska voters, and nativists into the new Republican Party to stand against the Slave Power.
Five years before, such a coalition would have been unimaginable. Members of those groups agreed on very little other than that they wanted all Americans to have equal economic opportunity. Once they began to work together to promote a fair economic system, though, they found much common ground. They ended up rededicating the nation to a "government of the people, by the people, and for the people."
Confederate leaders and Lincoln both knew about the political potential of a shock event. As we are in the midst of one, it seems worth noting that Lincoln seemed to have the better idea about how to use it."
COPY AND PASTE. DON"T "SHARE"
-- end of January 2017 posts